Determining Your Type

You now have three scores. Time to put the picture together.

Pull out your assessment scores:

• Movement: ___/100
• Transformation: ___/100
• Stability: ___/100

Your highest score is likely your dominant type. Your second highest is your secondary influence. The third is your least dominant quality, though it’s still part of your makeup.

How to Read Your Profile

If one score is dramatically higher than the others — say, 70 when the other two are 30 and 25 — you’re likely a strong single type. This is relatively uncommon. Most people are combinations.

If two scores are close and both significantly higher than the third — say, 65 and 60 with the third at 20 — you’re a dual type. This is common. Your primary type is the higher score, and your secondary type significantly shapes how that primary type expresses.

If all three scores are fairly close together — say, 45, 40, and 38 — you have a more balanced constitution. This has advantages (versatility) and disadvantages (harder to pin down what you need, because it shifts).

What Combinations Look Like

The combinations matter because they create specific patterns that aren’t obvious from the individual types alone.

Movement-Transformation is quick and intense. Fast mind, driven nature, tends to burn bright and flame out. The anxiety of Movement combined with the intensity of Transformation can create a kind of wired-and-tired state — pushing hard while simultaneously feeling unstable.

Movement-Stability is an interesting tension. One part wants change, the other resists it. These people can oscillate between bursts of activity and periods of complete stagnation. The lightness of Movement and the heaviness of Stability create a push-pull that can feel confusing from the inside.

Transformation-Stability is powerful and persistent. The drive of Transformation combined with the endurance of Stability creates someone who can work incredibly hard for long periods. The risk is that they push through everything — including signals to stop — and the collapse, when it comes, is profound.

Checking the Profile

Here’s the important part: does your profile match your experience of being you?

Numbers on a self-assessment can be wrong. You might have scored yourself inaccurately on some items. You might have been aspirational rather than honest. You might have a blind spot about certain traits.

So check it against reality. Think about the type descriptions from the previous lessons. Which one sounds like your life? Not which one you want to be. Which one sounds like how you function day to day.

Think about what people who know you well would say. If you told your best friend or your partner your type, would they agree? Sometimes other people see our patterns more clearly than we do.

If the profile doesn’t feel right, go back and re-score. Particularly check whether you were honest on the items you don’t like. Transformation types underrate their own anger. Stability types underrate their own resistance to change. Movement types underrate their own inconsistency. We all have blind spots about our least flattering traits.

Your Constitutional Profile

Write it down: “Primary ___, Secondary ___.”

This isn’t a permanent label. It’s a working model. You might refine it over time as you understand the types better and observe yourself more carefully. But having a working model is immensely more useful than having no model at all.

Today’s Practice

Write your constitutional profile. Primary type, secondary type. Then write a paragraph — just for yourself — about how this profile shows up in your daily life.

Where do you see it? In your energy patterns, your food preferences, your sleep habits, your emotional tendencies, your relationship style, your work habits. Where does the profile fit? Where does it not?

If it fits well, you’ve got a solid working model. If it doesn’t, don’t force it. Revisit the assessments, maybe ask someone who knows you to help you score. The goal is accuracy, not a nice-sounding label.