Original Text

道常無為而無不為。侯王若能守之,萬物將自化。

化而欲作,吾將鎮之以無名之樸。

無名之樸,夫亦將無欲。不欲以靜,天下將自定。

Transliteration

Dào cháng wúwéi ér wú bù wéi. Hóu wáng ruò néng shǒu zhī, wànwù jiāng zì huà.

Huà ér yù zuò, wú jiāng zhèn zhī yǐ wú míng zhī pǔ.

Wú míng zhī pǔ, fū yì jiāng wú yù. Bù yù yǐ jìng, tiānxià jiāng zì dìng.

Translation

The Tao does nothing, yet nothing is left undone. If lords and kings could hold to it, all things would transform of themselves. If, in transforming, desire should arise, I would still it with the nameless uncarved block. The nameless uncarved block brings freedom from desire. Free of desire and at rest, the world will settle itself.

James Legge (1891)

The Tao in its regular course does nothing (for the sake of doing it), and so there is nothing which it does not do. If princes and kings were able to maintain it, all things would of themselves be transformed by them. If this transformation became to me an object of desire, I would express the desire by the nameless simplicity. Simplicity without a name Is free from all external aim. With no desire, at rest and still, All things go right as of their will.

Dwight Goddard (1919)

Tao is apparently inactive (wu wei) and yet nothing remains undone. If princes and kings desire to keep everything in order, they must first reform themselves. If they still desire to change, I would pacify them by the simplicity of the ineffable Tao. This simplicity will end desire, and if desire be absent there is quietness. All people will of themselves be satisfied.

Commentary

This chapter closes the first half of the book (the "Tao" portion, chapters 1–37) by stating its governing paradox in its purest form: dào cháng wúwéi ér wú bù wéi — "the Tao does nothing, yet nothing is left undone." This single line is perhaps the clearest distillation of wúwéi in the entire text. The Tao does not strive, does not force, does not act with deliberate purpose — and yet through it everything is accomplished. The natural order, left to its own unforced operation, completes itself.

The political application follows: if those in power could simply hold to this principle of non-forcing, all things would "transform of themselves" (zì huà) — change and develop naturally, without coercion. But Laozi anticipates a problem: in the course of this natural transformation, desire and the impulse to grasp may arise. His remedy is the recurring image of , the nameless uncarved block — the unspoiled simplicity that, when held up, quiets the grasping impulse. Freedom from desire brings stillness, and from that stillness "the world will settle itself" (zì dìng). The whole vision is one of trust: that reality has a self-ordering tendency, and that the role of wisdom is not to impose order but to remove the disturbances — chiefly desire and forcing — that prevent the natural order from emerging on its own.

Cross-Tradition Connections

"Does nothing, yet nothing is left undone" is the supreme statement of effortless action, and it parallels the ideal found in the Bhagavad Gita of action-in-inaction — the realized one who acts without the agitated sense of being the doer, accomplishing all while grasping at nothing. It also resonates with the Christian mystical surrender in which one's own striving ceases and divine action flows through the stilled soul.

The conviction that reality has a self-ordering tendency, needing only the removal of interference, anticipates later ideas of spontaneous order and parallels the Taoist-influenced trust, echoed in contemplative traditions, that grace and natural goodness emerge when we stop forcing and let things be — "be still, and know."

Universal Application

There is a self-ordering tendency in reality that completes itself when not forced. The wise approach is often not to impose order but to remove the disturbances — chiefly grasping desire — that block the natural order from settling. Stillness and freedom from craving allow things to right themselves.

Modern Application

"Does nothing, yet nothing is left undone" is a profound counter to the cult of constant intervention and control. In leadership, parenting, healing, and creative work, much of the best outcome comes from creating conditions and then not interfering — trusting the self-organizing capacity of people and systems. When grasping desire arises (the urge to micromanage, to force a result), the remedy is to return to simplicity and stillness. Often the most effective action is to stop disturbing what is already finding its own way to settle.