About Popular / New Age Kabbalah

Popular and New Age Kabbalah refers to the late twentieth and early twenty-first century reception of kabbalistic teaching outside the traditional rabbinic communities, marked by simplified presentations of mystical concepts, the cultivation of a non-Jewish or transdenominational audience, and the integration of kabbalistic vocabulary into the broader spiritual marketplace of the New Age movement. Although kabbalistic ideas had circulated in Western occult and esoteric milieus since the Renaissance, the contemporary popular movement traces its principal institutional history to the work of Philip Berg (born Feivel Gruberger, 1929-2013) and the Kabbalah Centre, the network of teaching institutions and retail outlets that he and his wife Karen Berg built from a small Jerusalem yeshiva into an international organization with celebrity students and dozens of branches by the early 2000s.

Berg, originally trained in a Lithuanian yeshiva and ordained as an Orthodox rabbi, began his kabbalistic teaching in Israel in the 1960s under the influence of Yehuda Brandwein, a disciple of the prominent Lurianic interpreter Yehuda Ashlag (1885-1954). Ashlag's massive Sulam commentary on the Zohar, published in twenty-one volumes between 1945 and 1958, attempted to make the Zoharic literature accessible to non-specialist Hebrew readers and presented an interpretation of Lurianic Kabbalah informed by social and ethical concerns. Berg inherited from Brandwein the basic outlook of the Ashlag school but developed it in directions Ashlag had not anticipated. Where Ashlag had aimed at observant Jewish students with serious textual training, Berg aimed at a much wider audience including non-Jews and unaffiliated Jews seeking spiritual guidance, and where Ashlag had presented his teaching within an Orthodox communal framework, Berg increasingly detached the teaching from any specific Jewish observance.

The Kabbalah Centre's distinctive teaching framework emerged in the 1970s and 1980s as the Bergs developed their own institutional structure first in Israel, then in New York, and eventually in cities around the world. The teaching presented Kabbalah as a universal spiritual technology available to anyone regardless of religion, focused on practical results in everyday life—success, relationships, health, protection from negative forces—and centered on a small set of accessible practices including the meditation on the seventy-two names of God, the use of red string bracelets for protection, the drinking of blessed water (Kabbalah water), the visualization of Hebrew letters, and the regular study of the Zohar in special editions designed for the non-traditional reader. The 'scanning' of Zohar texts, in which a student passes the eyes over the Aramaic letters without necessarily understanding their meaning, was justified by Ashlag's teaching that the letters of the Zohar themselves carry spiritual energy that affects the reader regardless of comprehension.

By the early 2000s the Kabbalah Centre had become among the most visible religious phenomena in the contemporary Western spiritual landscape. Celebrity students including Madonna, Demi Moore, Britney Spears, Roseanne Barr, and others brought enormous public attention to the movement, and the Centre's Los Angeles, London, and New York branches became fashionable destinations for spiritual seekers who would not have considered an ordinary synagogue. The Centre published hundreds of books in multiple languages, operated a network of retail outlets selling kabbalistic merchandise, conducted weekend seminars and intensive courses, and organized large festival events. The Bergs themselves became wealthy and prominent religious entrepreneurs, and their organization grew to a scale unprecedented in the history of kabbalistic teaching.

The movement also drew sustained criticism from multiple directions. Within the Orthodox Jewish world, traditional rabbinic authorities denounced the Bergs for teaching Kabbalah to non-Jews, for departing from Orthodox observance, for commercial exploitation of sacred material, and for the simplifications and distortions of traditional teaching that the Centre's curriculum involved. Within the academic study of Kabbalah, scholars including Boaz Huss, Jody Myers, and Jonathan Garb produced detailed analyses that distinguished the Centre's actual practice from its sometimes inflated rhetoric and traced its specific intellectual lineage. Investigative journalism, including pieces in the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, and the British press, raised questions about the Centre's financial practices, its handling of celebrity students, and the fees charged for products and services. The death of Philip Berg in 2013 was followed by internal tensions within the organization, and the movement's public profile has subsequently diminished, though the Centre continues to operate at reduced scale with branches in several countries.

Beyond the Kabbalah Centre, the broader phenomenon of popular and New Age Kabbalah includes a number of other institutions and individual teachers. The Bnei Baruch movement, founded by Michael Laitman (born 1946) in Israel in the 1990s, draws on the same Ashlag lineage but presents itself as a more austere alternative to the Kabbalah Centre, with an emphasis on group study of Ashlag's writings and on Laitman's own elaborate teaching curriculum. Bnei Baruch has built a substantial international following through online courses, free literature, and a media operation. Other figures in the broader popular Kabbalah field include Z'ev ben Shimon Halevi (Warren Kenton, 1933-2020), who developed a non-traditional teaching of the Tree of Life informed by his association with the Society of the Inner Light and by the broader Western esoteric tradition; the Toledano Tradition associated with Halevi's network; David Solomon and various contemporary teachers operating in the wider New Age space; and the various authors of popular kabbalah books that have circulated since the 1970s in spiritual bookstores worldwide.

The relationship between this popular phenomenon and the older traditions of Kabbalah is complex. The Kabbalah Centre and similar movements draw real material from the Lurianic, Ashlag, and broader kabbalistic literature, and their teaching is not simply invented out of whole cloth. At the same time, they present this material in ways that differ significantly from its traditional setting: divorced from the prerequisite of Talmudic learning, separated from the obligation of Orthodox observance, simplified for accessibility, and integrated into a transdenominational spiritual marketplace that the original kabbalists could not have imagined. Whether these transformations represent legitimate developments of the tradition, distortions of it, or some hybrid that requires its own analytical category remains a question on which scholars and traditional practitioners continue to disagree.

Teachings

The teachings of popular and New Age Kabbalah, as represented especially by the Kabbalah Centre, are organized around a small set of central themes presented in accessible language. The first is the doctrine of light and vessel. Drawing on Lurianic teaching as mediated through Ashlag, the Centre presents reality as a system of divine light that pours forth from an infinite source and is contained or distorted by the vessels (kelim) that receive it. The human task is to become a vessel capable of receiving light without distorting it, which requires the cultivation of certain inner qualities—the desire to share, the willingness to overcome the ego, the capacity for unconditional love—and the avoidance of others. The technical Lurianic doctrine of the breaking of the vessels and the dispersion of holy sparks is presented as a metaphor for the human condition and for the work of spiritual transformation that the student must undertake.

The second teaching is the doctrine of the 99% and the 1%. The Centre teaches that ordinary perception accesses only 1% of reality—the physical world available to the senses—while 99% of reality remains hidden within the soul, the spiritual worlds, and the divine source. Spiritual practice opens access to the 99%, allowing the student to perceive what is normally invisible and to act on the basis of a fuller understanding of cause and effect. This framing makes the kabbalistic system intuitively accessible to students who have no background in traditional Jewish thought, and it gives a clear practical motivation for engagement with the teaching.

The third teaching is the doctrine of restriction. Drawing on Ashlag's reading of the Lurianic tzimtzum, the Centre teaches that spiritual progress requires the deliberate restriction of immediate ego-satisfaction in favor of long-term benefit. The student is asked to identify situations in which the immediate impulse is to grasp, react, complain, or judge, and to deliberately restrict that impulse in order to create space for a higher response. This teaching has affinities with various contemporary therapeutic and self-help approaches, and the Centre presents it in language that resonates with that broader literature.

A fourth teaching is the doctrine that the letters of the Zohar themselves carry spiritual energy. Drawing on Ashlag's claim that the Aramaic text of the Zohar is a kind of spiritual technology operating at the level of letter combinations independent of conscious comprehension, the Centre teaches that students can benefit from 'scanning' the Zohar—passing the eyes over the text without necessarily understanding the words—and from various exercises in visualization of Hebrew letters. This teaching is among the most distinctive features of the Centre's curriculum and among the most controversial within the broader academic and traditional Jewish discussions of Kabbalah.

A fifth teaching is the doctrine of astrological correspondences and the seventy-two names of God. The Centre teaches that the seventy-two three-letter names of God derived from a kabbalistic reading of Exodus 14:19-21 correspond to the seventy-two combinations of three signs of the zodiac and that meditation on specific names produces specific effects in the corresponding domains of life. This system, drawn from much older kabbalistic sources but presented in the Centre's curriculum in a particularly accessible form, has become one of the recognizable signatures of the movement.

The teaching is delivered through a combination of book study, weekend seminars, weekly classes, online courses, and one-on-one consultations with Centre teachers. The curriculum is organized into progressive levels with standardized titles—Power of Kabbalah I, II, and III—and students are encouraged to advance through the levels at their own pace.

Practices

The practices of popular and New Age Kabbalah include several distinctive elements that distinguish them from traditional kabbalistic disciplines. The first is the 'scanning' of the Zohar, in which the student passes the eyes over the Aramaic text of a particular section without necessarily understanding the words. The Centre's editions of the Zohar are designed to facilitate this practice with prominent Aramaic letters and accompanying English commentary. Scanning is presented as a spiritual exercise that accesses the energy of the text directly, bypassing the linguistic barrier that would otherwise prevent the non-specialist reader from benefiting from the Zohar.

A second practice is the meditation on the seventy-two names of God, drawn from the kabbalistic reading of Exodus 14:19-21 in which three consecutive verses, each containing exactly seventy-two letters, are arranged in a grid to produce seventy-two three-letter divine names. The Centre teaches that meditating on specific names at specific times produces specific effects—healing, prosperity, protection, spiritual elevation—and provides charts and posters showing the names with their corresponding correspondences and recommended uses. This is among the most identifiable practices associated with the Kabbalah Centre and has appeared frequently in popular media coverage of the movement.

A third practice is the use of physical objects believed to carry spiritual benefit. The red string bracelet, worn on the left wrist, is the most famous of these objects and was widely associated with celebrity students of the Centre in the 2000s. The Centre also markets blessed water ('Kabbalah water'), candles, talismans, and other items, and these objects are presented as carrying specific protective or transformative effects. The role of these material objects in the Centre's teaching has been one of the focal points of both academic analysis and journalistic critique.

A fourth practice is the observance of certain Jewish holidays and the recitation of certain prayers, presented as universal spiritual technologies rather than as specifically Jewish religious obligations. Centre members participate in Pesach seders, Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur services, and other Jewish liturgical events, but these are framed as opportunities for spiritual elevation accessible to anyone regardless of background. The traditional halakhic requirements that would normally accompany these observances—dietary laws, Sabbath observance, study prerequisites—are de-emphasized or treated as optional.

A fifth practice is participation in the social and educational programs of the Centre itself: weekly classes, weekend seminars, retreat events at the Centre's various locations, online courses, and one-on-one consultations with teachers. The community-formation function of these programs has been studied by sociologists of religion who note that for many Centre students the social belonging and identity-formation aspects are at least as important as the formal teaching content. Bnei Baruch and other popular Kabbalah movements have similar social structures around their distinctive teaching programs.

Initiation

Popular and New Age Kabbalah deliberately minimizes the prerequisites and initiatory structures that have historically governed access to kabbalistic teaching. The Kabbalah Centre's foundational claim is that Kabbalah should be available to anyone who is interested, regardless of prior background, religious affiliation, or level of preparation. There are no formal requirements for entry into the Centre's basic courses: a student walks in, signs up for a class, pays the fee, and begins. This deliberate openness is one of the features that distinguishes the popular movement most sharply from traditional kabbalistic instruction, in which the teacher would typically refuse to teach material to a student who lacked the relevant Talmudic and halakhic preparation.

That said, the popular movement does have its own informal structures of progression and recognition. Centre students typically begin with the introductory Power of Kabbalah course, which presents the basic vocabulary and central teachings in a format accessible to absolute beginners. Successful completion leads to more advanced courses, to the privilege of attending special events with senior teachers, and eventually to the possibility of being trained as a Centre teacher oneself. The Centre maintains its own training programs for new teachers, who are expected to internalize the curriculum and to demonstrate the personal qualities the Centre considers important before being authorized to teach. The senior teachers and the Berg family members occupy positions of authority within the organizational structure.

In Bnei Baruch, the structure is somewhat different. New students are encouraged to join study groups that meet regularly to read Ashlag's writings and Laitman's commentaries together. Progression through the curriculum is gradual and is marked by increasing access to more advanced material and to direct contact with Laitman himself. The community has its own internal markers of seniority and commitment, including financial contributions, volunteer service, and participation in international events.

For both organizations, the absence of traditional initiatory ceremonies is itself a deliberate teaching: the popular movement insists that the spiritual benefits of Kabbalah should not be reserved for an initiated elite but should be available to anyone willing to study and practice. Whether this democratization is a legitimate development or a problematic loosening of safeguards remains the central contested question about the entire movement.

Notable Members

Yehuda Ashlag (1885-1954), the Polish-born Jerusalem rabbi whose massive Sulam commentary on the Zohar and whose philosophical-mystical treatises form the immediate textual foundation for the contemporary popular movement, even though Ashlag himself was a strictly Orthodox figure who would not have endorsed the developments his work would later inspire. Baruch Ashlag (1907-1991), Yehuda Ashlag's son and the principal teacher of the next generation, who maintained his father's tradition in a more traditional Orthodox setting in Bnei Brak.

Yehuda Brandwein, a disciple of Yehuda Ashlag, who taught Philip Berg and provided the bridge between the Ashlag tradition and the popular movement that Berg would build. Philip Berg (Feivel Gruberger, 1929-2013), the founder and central figure of the Kabbalah Centre, originally trained as an Orthodox rabbi in a Lithuanian yeshiva before developing his distinctive popularizing approach to kabbalistic teaching. Karen Berg (born 1942), Philip's wife and co-founder of the Centre, who continued to lead the organization after his death. Their sons Yehuda Berg and Michael Berg, who took over significant teaching and administrative roles in the Centre during its peak years.

Michael Laitman (born 1946), the founder of Bnei Baruch, who studied with Baruch Ashlag and developed his own elaborate teaching curriculum based on Ashlag's writings, building Bnei Baruch into a substantial international movement with branches in multiple countries. Among other teachers in the broader popular Kabbalah field: Z'ev ben Shimon Halevi (Warren Kenton, 1933-2020), who developed a non-traditional teaching of the Tree of Life informed by his association with the Society of the Inner Light; David Solomon, a contemporary teacher operating in the Sephardic kabbalistic tradition with adaptations for non-traditional audiences; and various other authors and teachers who have published popular books and conducted seminars over the past several decades.

The principal academic critics and analysts of the movement include Boaz Huss of Ben-Gurion University, whose scholarly articles and book on the Kabbalah Centre have been particularly influential; Jody Myers of California State University, Northridge, whose Kabbalah and the Spiritual Quest provided one of the first substantial monograph-length studies; Jonathan Garb of the Hebrew University, whose The Chosen Will Become Herds situates the popular movement in the broader context of contemporary Israeli and global Kabbalah; and Veronique Altglas, whose From Yoga to Kabbalah offers a comparative sociological analysis.

Symbols

The most recognizable symbol of popular and New Age Kabbalah is the red string bracelet, worn on the left wrist and believed to provide protection against the evil eye and against negative energies generally. The Kabbalah Centre's marketing of these bracelets in the 1990s and 2000s, and their adoption by Madonna and other celebrity students, made them an instantly recognizable fashion item and the most famous physical artifact associated with the movement. The bracelets are typically blessed at Rachel's Tomb near Bethlehem before being distributed by the Centre, a practice that draws on a much older Jewish tradition of pilgrimage to the matriarch's grave site.

The Tree of Life diagram—the standard kabbalistic schema of ten sefirot connected by twenty-two paths—has been adopted by the popular movement as one of its principal visual symbols. Posters, books, jewelry, and decorative objects featuring the Tree of Life appear throughout the merchandise of the Kabbalah Centre and similar institutions. The diagram is presented as a map of consciousness and of the divine architecture, accessible to study by anyone interested.

The seventy-two names of God, displayed as a grid of seventy-two three-letter Hebrew name combinations, have become another characteristic visual symbol. The Centre publishes posters, charts, and meditation cards featuring this grid, and individual names are sometimes worn as pendants or printed on cards for personal meditation. The visual presentation of the names in stylized Hebrew calligraphy has become a recognizable signature of popular kabbalah materials.

Other characteristic symbols include the Hebrew letter combinations associated with various meditative practices, the figure of the Zohar volume itself (often presented as a kind of devotional object), images of the Western Wall and of other Jerusalem holy sites that the Centre uses in its publications and on its websites, and the various photographs and images of Philip and Karen Berg that have circulated among Centre students.

For Bnei Baruch and similar movements, the visual symbols are somewhat more austere. Photographs of Yehuda Ashlag and of Baruch Ashlag are displayed prominently in study halls and in publications, the Sulam commentary on the Zohar is presented as the central textual symbol, and the geometric diagrams of the Lurianic worlds and partzufim that Ashlag developed are used as teaching aids and as visual representations of the system. Bnei Baruch's logo and graphic identity emphasize a more restrained aesthetic that differentiates it from the more colorful merchandising of the Kabbalah Centre.

Influence

The influence of popular and New Age Kabbalah on contemporary religion and culture has been substantial, though sometimes diffuse. Within the explicitly religious sphere, the Kabbalah Centre and similar movements have introduced kabbalistic vocabulary and concepts to millions of people who would otherwise have had no contact with Jewish mystical tradition. Books published by the Centre and by other popular Kabbalah authors have sold in the millions of copies in dozens of languages, and the basic concepts of light, vessel, restriction, soul-root, and tikkun have become recognizable elements of contemporary spiritual discourse.

Within the celebrity culture of the 1990s and 2000s, the Kabbalah Centre's association with Madonna and other prominent figures gave the movement a cultural visibility that no previous form of Jewish mysticism had ever achieved. The red string bracelet became a recognizable fashion item, the term 'Kabbalah' entered the popular media vocabulary as a synonym for fashionable spirituality, and the Centre's Los Angeles, London, and New York locations became destinations for journalists, photographers, and curiosity-seekers. This celebrity moment was relatively brief—roughly 1998 to 2008—but its cultural impact was disproportionate to its duration.

Within the academic study of religion, popular Kabbalah has become an important case study in the broader analysis of contemporary spirituality, the New Age movement, religious commodification, and what Veronique Altglas calls 'religious bricolage.' Boaz Huss's various studies, Jody Myers's Kabbalah and the Spiritual Quest (Praeger 2007), Jonathan Garb's The Chosen Will Become Herds (Yale 2009), and Altglas's own From Yoga to Kabbalah (Oxford 2014) have together produced a substantial scholarly literature on the movement that has influenced the way the broader phenomenon of contemporary spirituality is understood by social scientists and religious studies scholars.

The financial and organizational scale of the Kabbalah Centre at its peak made it one of the largest religious entrepreneurial enterprises in the contemporary spiritual marketplace, and its operational practices have been studied as a model of how a religious organization can grow through celebrity endorsement, mass media outreach, retail operations, and standardized curriculum design. The decline of the Centre after Philip Berg's death in 2013 and the subsequent shrinkage of its public profile have themselves become subjects for sociological analysis.

A more diffuse cultural influence operates through the wider New Age and self-help literature, much of which has absorbed kabbalistic vocabulary and frameworks without acknowledging their specific source. References to the Tree of Life, to the doctrine of tikkun, to the seventy-two names of God, and to the basic categories of light and vessel appear in books and programs that have no direct connection to any formal kabbalistic institution but that nonetheless reflect the long indirect impact of the popular kabbalah teaching of the past several decades.

Significance

The significance of popular and New Age Kabbalah lies in its unprecedented translation of an esoteric Jewish mystical tradition into a transdenominational spiritual movement accessible to a global audience. For the first time in the history of Kabbalah, technical material that had been the preserve of small initiated circles—the meditation on divine names, the practical kavvanot, the doctrine of soul-roots and gilgul—was presented in popular books, weekend seminars, and television interviews to audiences with no prior background in Jewish texts or observance. Whatever one thinks of the theological legitimacy of this development, its sheer scale gives it a place in the history of contemporary religion that cannot be ignored.

The movement has also raised, in an unusually sharp form, the question of the proper boundaries of mystical transmission. Traditional kabbalistic teaching had insisted on extensive prerequisites: Talmudic learning, halakhic observance, advanced age, demonstrated piety, and master-disciple initiation under careful supervision. Popular Kabbalah has dispensed with virtually all of these prerequisites and asks only that students be open to the teaching and willing to participate in its practices. Whether this represents a democratization of access to spiritual goods that should never have been restricted in the first place, or a dangerous loosening of safeguards that the tradition had developed for good reason, is a question that the popular movement has forced into the open and that the academic literature on the subject continues to debate.

The economic and social significance of the movement has also been considerable. The Kabbalah Centre at its height was a multimillion-dollar international organization with its own publishing house, retail operation, real estate holdings, and educational infrastructure. The financial scale of contemporary Kabbalah teaching, the role of celebrity endorsement in religious marketing, and the relationship between spiritual instruction and commercial transaction have all become subjects of analysis for sociologists of religion and scholars of New Age movements. Veronique Altglas's From Yoga to Kabbalah (Oxford 2014) is the most thorough sociological study of the movement, and her concept of 'religious bricolage' has become a standard framework for understanding the broader context within which popular Kabbalah operates.

The cultural significance of the movement, beyond its formal organizational base, has been even more diffuse. Concepts and vocabulary from the popular Kabbalah literature have entered the general discourse of contemporary spirituality. References to the Tree of Life, to the seventy-two names of God, to the doctrine of tikkun (often translated as 'spiritual repair' without further specification), and to the basic categories of light and vessel have appeared in self-help books, business motivation literature, holistic health programs, and yoga studio offerings that have no direct connection to the Kabbalah Centre or to any other formal kabbalistic institution. This diffuse cultural presence is in some ways the most lasting effect of the popular movement.

Connections

Popular and New Age Kabbalah descends through a specific historical line from Lurianic Kabbalah as developed by Rabbi Isaac Luria and his disciples, then mediated through the work of Yehuda Ashlag and his disciple Baruch Ashlag. Ashlag's massive Sulam commentary on the Zohar (published 1945-1958) and his philosophical-mystical treatises including Talmud Eser HaSefirot form the immediate textual foundation for the contemporary popular movement. The Kabbalah Centre's founder Philip Berg studied with Yehuda Brandwein, a disciple of Ashlag, and the Bnei Baruch movement led by Michael Laitman traces its lineage through Baruch Ashlag.

Behind the Ashlag tradition stand the broader sources of post-Lurianic Kabbalah including the writings of Chaim Vital and the foundational compilations Etz Chaim, Shaar HaGilgulim, and Shaar HaKavanot. The original textual source of all kabbalistic teaching, the Zohar, is central to popular Kabbalah practice through the distinctive techniques of 'scanning' and visual contemplation that the Centre developed. Earlier sources studied or referenced in popular Kabbalah materials include the Sefer Yetzirah and Joseph Gikatilla's Shaarei Orah, particularly through the influential English translations of Aryeh Kaplan in the 1970s and 1980s.

The popular movement stands in a complex relationship with the older Jewish mystical traditions, including Safed Renaissance Kabbalah, the Sephardic-Mizrachi Kabbalah of Beit El, and the entire range of Hasidic teaching including Chabad, all of which it draws upon selectively while transforming their original communal and observant context.

The movement also stands in close relationship with the broader Western esoteric tradition, including Christian Kabbalah with which it shares the practice of presenting Jewish mystical material to non-Jewish audiences, and with the contemporary Neo-Hasidic revival with which it overlaps in some respects though it differs in others. The academic study of Kabbalah has produced the principal critical literature on popular Kabbalah, including the work of Boaz Huss, Jody Myers, Jonathan Garb, Veronique Altglas, and Wouter Hanegraaff. The principal organization of the field is Philip Berg's Kabbalah Centre, founded in 1965 and expanded into an international network in the following decades.

The movement's distinctive sefirotic vocabulary draws on the foundational concepts of Kabbalah including the ten sefirot, the doctrine of light and vessel, and the Lurianic mythology of the breaking and rectification of the worlds. Earlier Western reception of similar material runs through the Hermetic tradition, the Rosicrucian Order, and the Theosophical Society, all of which contributed to the broader twentieth-century Western esoteric environment within which the popular kabbalah movement emerged. Earlier Jewish source figures whose work the popular movement draws on include Aryeh Kaplan, whose translations of the Sefer Yetzirah and the Bahir made medieval kabbalistic texts accessible to English-speaking general readers in the 1970s and 1980s. For the foundational tradition see Kabbalah.

Further Reading

  • A New Age of Kabbalah: Contemporary Kabbalah, the New Age and Postmodern Spirituality by Boaz Huss (article, Hebrew University, 2007)
  • Kabbalah and the Spiritual Quest: The Kabbalah Centre in America by Jody Myers (Praeger, 2007)
  • The Chosen Will Become Herds: Studies in Twentieth-Century Kabbalah by Jonathan Garb (Yale, 2009)
  • From Yoga to Kabbalah: Religious Exoticism and the Logics of Bricolage by Veronique Altglas (Oxford, 2014)
  • New Age Religion and Western Culture: Esotericism in the Mirror of Secular Thought by Wouter Hanegraaff (Brill, 1996)
  • Yearnings of the Soul: Psychological Thought in Modern Kabbalah by Jonathan Garb (Chicago, 2015)
  • Kabbalah: A Very Short Introduction by Joseph Dan (Oxford, 2006), chapter on contemporary movements
  • The Question of the Existence of Jewish Mysticism by Boaz Huss (Magnes Press, 2016)

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Kabbalah Centre and how did it begin?

The Kabbalah Centre is the network of teaching institutions and retail outlets founded by Philip Berg (born Feivel Gruberger, 1929-2013) and his wife Karen Berg, beginning in Israel in the 1960s and expanding internationally over the following decades. Berg, originally trained in a Lithuanian yeshiva and ordained as an Orthodox rabbi, studied with Yehuda Brandwein, a disciple of the prominent Lurianic interpreter Yehuda Ashlag. From this lineage Berg inherited Ashlag's tradition of presenting Lurianic Kabbalah in accessible form, but he developed it in directions Ashlag had not anticipated, aimed at a much wider audience including non-Jews and unaffiliated Jews seeking spiritual guidance. The Centre grew through the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s into an international organization with celebrity students, dozens of branches in major cities, hundreds of published books, weekend seminars, retail operations, and standardized curriculum. By the early 2000s it was the most visible expression of contemporary popular Kabbalah.

How is popular Kabbalah different from traditional Kabbalah?

Popular Kabbalah differs from traditional Kabbalah in several specific ways. First, it dispenses with the prerequisites that traditional teaching had insisted upon: Talmudic learning, halakhic observance, advanced age, demonstrated piety, and master-disciple initiation. Anyone interested can sign up for a course regardless of background. Second, it is presented as a universal spiritual technology rather than as a specifically Jewish religious tradition, accessible to non-Jews and unaffiliated Jews on the same terms as observant ones. Third, it focuses on practical results in everyday life—success, relationships, health, protection—rather than on the elaborate cosmological speculation and ritual kavvanot that occupied traditional kabbalists. Fourth, it operates in a commercial framework that includes retail outlets, paid courses, branded merchandise, and a standardized curriculum, in contrast to the traditional model in which kabbalistic teaching was given without charge by master to disciple within an established religious community. Whether these differences represent legitimate developments or problematic distortions of the tradition is the central contested question about the popular movement.

Who was Yehuda Ashlag and how does he relate to the popular movement?

Yehuda Ashlag (1885-1954) was a Polish-born Jerusalem rabbi who produced the most influential modern interpretation of Lurianic Kabbalah. His massive Sulam commentary on the Zohar, published in twenty-one volumes between 1945 and 1958, attempted to make the Zoharic literature accessible to non-specialist Hebrew readers. He also wrote philosophical-mystical treatises including Talmud Eser HaSefirot and various essays on the social and ethical implications of Lurianic teaching. Ashlag himself was strictly Orthodox and would not have endorsed the popular movement that would later draw on his work. The bridge between the Ashlag tradition and the contemporary popular movement runs through his disciple Yehuda Brandwein, who taught Philip Berg, and through his son Baruch Ashlag, who taught Michael Laitman. Both Berg's Kabbalah Centre and Laitman's Bnei Baruch trace their textual and intellectual lineage to Ashlag, even though they have developed his teaching in ways that depart significantly from his own Orthodox communal context.

What do scholars say about the Kabbalah Centre?

Academic scholars of Kabbalah have produced a substantial critical literature on the Kabbalah Centre that combines respectful attention to the actual content of the Centre's teaching with careful analysis of its departures from the older tradition. Boaz Huss has published several articles tracing the Centre's intellectual lineage and analyzing its claims. Jody Myers's Kabbalah and the Spiritual Quest (2007) provided the first substantial monograph-length study, drawing on extensive ethnographic research at the Centre. Jonathan Garb's The Chosen Will Become Herds (2009) situates the Centre within the broader context of twentieth-century Kabbalah. Veronique Altglas's From Yoga to Kabbalah (2014) offers a comparative sociological analysis using the framework of religious bricolage. The general scholarly consensus distinguishes between the genuine Lurianic and Ashlag material that the Centre transmits and the simplifications, additions, and commercial framings that the Centre has added to that material. Most scholars treat the movement as a significant contemporary religious phenomenon worth taking seriously without endorsing its theological claims.

What is Bnei Baruch and how does it differ from the Kabbalah Centre?

Bnei Baruch is the international Kabbalah movement founded by Michael Laitman (born 1946) in Israel in the 1990s. Laitman studied with Baruch Ashlag in his final years and presents himself as the principal contemporary heir of the Ashlag tradition. Bnei Baruch differs from the Kabbalah Centre in several specific ways. It presents itself as a more austere alternative without the celebrity associations and merchandise that characterized the Centre at its peak. Its teaching emphasizes group study of Ashlag's writings and of Laitman's own elaborate commentaries, with less focus on individual segulot, amulets, and physical objects. It distributes much of its literature for free through online channels and operates a substantial international media operation including its own television station broadcasting in multiple languages. Despite these differences, Bnei Baruch faces some of the same scholarly and traditional critiques as the Kabbalah Centre, since it shares the basic move of presenting Lurianic Kabbalah to a non-traditional audience without the prerequisites that traditional teaching had insisted upon.