Martin Buber
Philosopher and interpreter of Hasidism — I and Thou introduced the I-Thou/I-It distinction into modern thought, placing genuine relational encounter at the center of religious and ethical life; his Hasidic writings brought that mystical tradition to a broad modern audience.
About Martin Buber
Martin Buber (1878–1965) was born in Vienna and raised largely by his grandfather Solomon Buber, a notable Hasidic scholar, in Lemberg. He studied philosophy at Vienna, Leipzig, Berlin, and Zurich, and became active in the Zionist movement while still a student. He edited the Zionist journal Die Welt and became associated with cultural Zionism rather than the purely political strand advocated by Theodor Herzl.
His early encounter with Hasidism changed the direction of his life. He began collecting and retelling Hasidic stories and legends, publishing The Tales of Rabbi Nachman (1906) and The Legend of the Baal-Shem (1908), works that introduced Hasidic spirituality to educated German Jewish and non-Jewish readers. His interpretation of Hasidism emphasized joy, the sanctification of everyday life, and divine encounter in the mundane — though later scholars (particularly Gershom Scholem) argued that his readings were selective and romanticized.
I and Thou (Ich und Du), published in 1923, is his most enduring philosophical work. It distinguishes two fundamental attitudes or modes of relating: the I-Thou relation, in which one addresses another as a full presence — a genuine other — and the I-It relation, in which one treats the other as an object of use or analysis. Genuine encounter with God, with other persons, and even with nature involves the I-Thou relation; most of ordinary life runs on I-It. But I-Thou moments cannot be willed or sustained; they arise and pass.
Contributions
The I-Thou/I-It philosophical distinction as a framework for understanding genuine versus objectifying relations; retelling and interpreting Hasidic tradition for a modern audience; advocacy for dialogue (genuine mutual address) as the foundational act of human and religious life; a German translation of the Hebrew Bible (with Rosenzweig) that attempted to restore the original's oral and rhythmic qualities; development of "dialogue philosophy" as a distinct stream within existentialism.
Works
I and Thou (Ich und Du, 1923); Tales of the Hasidim (collected 1947–48, originally published in two volumes); The Legend of the Baal-Shem (1908); Moses: The Revelation and the Covenant (1946); Two Types of Faith (1950, comparing Jewish and Christian faith as trust versus belief-that); Paths in Utopia (1949, on communitarian socialism); The Knowledge of Man (1965, collected philosophical essays); the Buber-Rosenzweig Bible translation, published in installments from 1926 onward.
Controversies
Gershom Scholem, the foremost scholar of Jewish mysticism, repeatedly criticized Buber's interpretation of Hasidism as selective, romanticized, and insufficiently attentive to the halakhic (legal) dimension of Hasidic practice. Scholem argued that Buber extracted a "teaching" from Hasidism that Hasidism itself would not recognize. This debate, conducted in print over several decades, remains a significant episode in 20th-century Jewish intellectual history. Buber's political positions — advocacy for a binational state and his acceptance of a professorship in Jerusalem while opposing the dominant political Zionism — made him a controversial figure within the Zionist movement he had helped to found.
Notable Quotes
"All real living is meeting." — I and Thou (trans. Ronald Gregor Smith)
"The world is not comprehensible, but it is embraceable." — attributed
Legacy
Buber's I and Thou remains in print and in use across philosophy, theology, psychology, and education. His influence on humanistic psychology — particularly Carl Rogers's client-centered therapy, which drew directly on the I-Thou model — extended his ideas into clinical practice. His Hasidic writings, whatever their scholarly limitations, created the primary channel through which Hasidic spirituality entered general Western culture. His political advocacy for dialogue between peoples in conflict, and his personal meetings with Arab intellectuals, made him an early model for what interfaith and intercultural dialogue could look like in practice.
Significance
I and Thou introduced a vocabulary and conceptual framework that influenced philosophy, theology, psychology, and education far beyond its original Jewish context. Karl Barth, Paul Tillich, and Emmanuel Levinas all engaged Buber's dialogue philosophy; the humanistic psychology of Carl Rogers drew on it explicitly. The I-Thou/I-It distinction became a standard reference point in 20th-century discussions of personhood, relationship, and ethics.
His work on Hasidism brought that tradition out of internal Jewish discussion and made it available to readers across religious backgrounds. Whether or not his interpretation is historically accurate (a matter of significant scholarly debate), his influence in shaping how Hasidism has been received in modern Western culture is undeniable.
His political positions — particularly his advocacy for a binational Arab-Jewish state in Palestine, which he maintained from the 1920s onward against the dominant Zionist consensus — positioned him as a consistent dissenting voice on the question that became the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Connections
Moses Maimonides — Both figures represent major attempts to bring Jewish thought into dialogue with the dominant philosophical frameworks of their respective eras; Buber's dialogue philosophy stands in implicit contrast to Maimonides's rationalist tradition
Abraham Joshua Heschel — A close contemporary and fellow Jewish existentialist philosopher; both Buber and Heschel emphasized encounter, presence, and the irreducibility of religious experience to rational categories
Rumi — The Sufi emphasis on the transformation of the self through divine encounter finds resonance in Buber's I-Thou; both traditions locate the sacred in relational presence rather than doctrinal proposition
Franz Rosenzweig — Buber's close collaborator on the German translation of the Hebrew Bible and a fellow proponent of Jewish existentialist thought; Rosenzweig's Star of Redemption and Buber's I and Thou are companion texts in Jewish philosophy
Further Reading
- Martin Buber, I and Thou, trans. Walter Kaufmann (Scribner, 1970)
- Paul Mendes-Flohr, Martin Buber: A Life of Faith and Dissent (Yale University Press, 2019)
- Maurice Friedman, Martin Buber: The Life of Dialogue (University of Chicago Press, 1955)
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was Martin Buber?
Martin Buber (1878–1965) was born in Vienna and raised largely by his grandfather Solomon Buber, a notable Hasidic scholar, in Lemberg. He studied philosophy at Vienna, Leipzig, Berlin, and Zurich, and became active in the Zionist movement while still a student. He edited the Zionist journal Die Welt and became associated with cultural Zionism rather than the purely political strand advocated by Theodor Herzl.
What is Martin Buber known for?
Martin Buber is known for: The I and Thou (Ich und Du) philosophy of dialogue; his retelling and interpretation of Hasidic stories and mysticism; his Zionist thought (advocating a binational state in Palestine); his translations of the Hebrew Bible into German (with Franz Rosenzweig); his influence on Christian existentialist theology, psychology, and interfaith dialogue
What was Martin Buber's legacy?
Martin Buber's legacy: Buber's I and Thou remains in print and in use across philosophy, theology, psychology, and education. His influence on humanistic psychology — particularly Carl Rogers's client-centered therapy, which drew directly on the I-Thou model — extended his ideas into clinical practice. His Hasidic writings, whatever their scholarly limitations, created the primary channel through which Hasidic spirituality entered general Western culture. His political advocacy for dialogue between peoples in conflict, and his personal meetings with Arab intellectuals, made him an early model for what interfaith and intercultural dialogue could look like in practice.