About Enkidu

Enkidu was made from clay and divine breath, shaped by the goddess Aruru at the request of Anu to be a counterweight to the restless king of Uruk. He came into the world as a creature of the steppe — hairy, enormous, running with the gazelles, drinking at the watering holes with the animals, knowing nothing of bread or beer or the art of living among people. The Sumerian and Akkadian scribes who recorded his story in the tablets of the Epic of Gilgamesh were precise about what this wildness meant: he was not an animal and not yet a man. He was humanity before civilization had gotten hold of it. Strong, instinctual, morally uncomplicated, and incapable of the loneliness that comes from being able to imagine oneself as separate from the world.

The process of his transformation — what the tablets call the coming of Enkidu to knowledge — begins with a temple priestess named Shamhat, sent by a trapper to the watering hole where Enkidu drank. She lay with him for six days and seven nights. When it was done, the gazelles fled. The animals of the steppe recognized something had changed in him before he did. He was slower. He knew things he had not known before. He sat at Shamhat's feet and she taught him to eat bread, drink beer, anoint himself with oil, and wear clothing. She told him about Gilgamesh, the king of Uruk who walked with the arrogance of a god and crushed his people under the weight of his energy. Enkidu was outraged. He went to Uruk.

The meeting with Gilgamesh is a wrestling match that neither wins clearly. Some tablets describe Gilgamesh stopping Enkidu in the street by force; others describe a near-equal contest in a doorway. What happens afterward is the point: they become inseparable. The Epic's Akkadian phrase is ki-ma aš-šum ra-ma-ni-šu — like a wife, Gilgamesh loved him. The friendship is the central fact of the text. It is the first great literary friendship in the world, and it is not gentle. They go together to the Cedar Forest to cut the sacred trees and kill Humbaba, the terrifying guardian placed there by Enlil. They refuse the advances of Inanna and kill the Bull of Heaven she sends in retaliation. Enkidu is the one who throws the bull's haunch at Inanna's face — a gesture of contempt that will cost him his life.

The gods convene. Humbaba is dead. The Bull of Heaven is dead. Anu, Enlil, and Shamash deliberate over which of the two must die. Enkidu falls ill. He lies on his bed for twelve days and on the twelfth day he dies. The death of Enkidu is the engine of the entire second half of the Epic. Gilgamesh refuses to bury the body for seven days, waiting for Enkidu to move, to wake, to breathe. When he finally does, he walks away from Uruk into the wilderness — the same wilderness Enkidu had come from — to find Utnapishtim and the secret of immortality. He fails. He returns to Uruk. He looks at the walls. He tells the ferryman Urshanabi: here is what I have built. The Epic ends not with conquest but with the king looking at his city and understanding, for the first time, that it is enough.

Without Enkidu's death, Gilgamesh learns nothing. This is the architecture of the oldest epic: the wild man must die so the king can become human. Civilization is built on that grief.

Mythology

The Creation in the Steppe

Tablet I of the Standard Babylonian Epic describes Enkidu's origin with unusual specificity. The people of Uruk complain to Anu about Gilgamesh — the king is overwhelming them, claiming the right of the first night, driving them in exhausting athletic contests, pushing the city's young men past their limits. Anu hears the complaint and instructs the mother goddess Aruru, who originally created humanity from clay, to make a counterpart to Gilgamesh — someone of equal strength who can absorb the king's energy. Aruru washes her hands, pinches off clay, and throws it down into the steppe. Enkidu is born there, already adult, enormous, running with the gazelles and drinking with the wild animals at the watering hole. The tablets are careful about his nature: he knows nothing of bread, beer, people, or cultivated land. But he also protects the animals — he fills in hunters' traps and tears out their snares. He is not an animal; he is a guardian of the natural order against human encroachment.

The Taming by Shamhat

A trapper who encounters Enkidu at the watering hole is terrified and brings the problem to Gilgamesh. Gilgamesh's instruction is precise and not naive: he tells the trapper to take Shamhat, a priestess of Inanna's temple, to the watering hole and let Enkidu see her. This is not a seduction story. The tablets describe Shamhat's role in terms of civilization's arts — what she gives Enkidu is not only sexual experience but the full suite of what it means to be human. After six days and seven nights, the animals recognize Enkidu as changed and flee. Shamhat feeds him bread and beer, anoints him with oil, and gives him two garments. She teaches him about Gilgamesh and the city of Uruk. Enkidu's response is to feel lonely for the first time — to notice the absence of companions — and to walk toward the city rather than back toward the steppe.

The Meeting with Gilgamesh

Two versions of the meeting survive. In the Old Babylonian version, Enkidu blocks Gilgamesh's path to a wedding house where the king intends to exercise royal prerogative over the bride. They wrestle in the street. The earth shakes. Neither clearly prevails. Then, instead of finishing the fight, Gilgamesh stops and they embrace. The Standard Babylonian version describes the encounter as happening in a street, emphasizing the embrace after the contest. What the tablets agree on is the aftermath: Gilgamesh's mother Ninsun interprets the friendship as fated. The two become inseparable. Enkidu becomes Gilgamesh's companion, his second self, the one who will go with him into the Cedar Forest.

The Cedar Forest and the Death of Humbaba

Gilgamesh proposes the expedition to the Cedar Forest to cut trees and establish a name that will outlast his death. Enkidu's reaction is not enthusiasm but fear — he knows the Cedar Forest, he has heard of Humbaba, the guardian placed there by Enlil, whose roar is a flood and whose mouth is fire. He argues against the expedition. Gilgamesh persists. They go. The journey takes them far beyond the known world. Enkidu's dreams during the journey are terrifying — he sees himself seized by a figure of crushing strength, suffocated, turned to a dove. At the Cedar Forest they fight and kill Humbaba. Shamash assists by pinning Humbaba in place with storm winds. Humbaba pleads for mercy; Enkidu urges Gilgamesh to kill him quickly before Enlil's rage compounds. They do. They cut the trees and float the timber back to Uruk.

The Bull of Heaven and the Divine Sentence

Back in Uruk, Inanna proposes to Gilgamesh. He refuses her with a long speech cataloguing the fates of her previous lovers. Inanna, furious, goes to Anu and demands the Bull of Heaven. Anu initially refuses; she threatens to open the gates of the underworld and raise the dead. He gives her the bull. The Bull of Heaven descends to Uruk, opening pits in the earth with each snort. Enkidu seizes it by the horns and Gilgamesh kills it. Then Enkidu tears off the bull's haunch and throws it at Inanna's face. The gods convene. Anu, Enlil, and Shamash deliberate: Humbaba is dead, the Bull of Heaven is dead. One of the two heroes must die. Shamash argues for mercy; Enlil overrules him. Enkidu is chosen.

The Illness, the Dreams, and the Death

Enkidu falls sick on a bed in Uruk. He has two sets of dreams before he dies. In the first, he curses the cedar door he and Gilgamesh made from the Cedar Forest timber — if he had known the wood would cost him his life he would have burned it with an axe. He curses the trapper who first saw him at the watering hole. He curses Shamhat for taming him. Shamash speaks from heaven and persuades him to bless her instead: Gilgamesh will honor Enkidu's memory above all things; kings will mourn him; after Enkidu's death, Gilgamesh will let his hair grow matted and walk out into the wilderness — the wilderness that was once Enkidu's home. This comforts him. He blesses Shamhat. Then he has the second dream: he sees himself in the House of Dust, the land of the dead, where former kings sit in darkness and the great gods of the underworld serve their food of clay and their water of dust. He dies on the twelfth day. Gilgamesh refuses to believe it. He waits seven days for Enkidu to wake. A maggot falls from his nostril. Gilgamesh buries him and begins his walk into the wilderness.

Symbols & Iconography

The Clay / the Hairy Body — Enkidu is made from clay pinched by Aruru, and the tablets describe him at the watering hole as covered in hair like the god of animals Sumuqan, his body matted, his frame like a boulder. Clay is the material of Mesopotamian creation myths — humans are made from clay mixed with the blood of a slain god in the Atrahasis Epic — and the hairy body signals pre-civilized vitality. He is wild potential before form has been imposed on it. The hair is not incidental: it is what the animals recognize, and it is what begins to recede once he lies with Shamhat. The clay is what makes him kin to every human being created from the same material by the same divine hands.

The Watering Hole — Enkidu's home before civilization is the watering hole of the steppe, shared equally with gazelles, lions, and other animals. It is a liminal space in Mesopotamian symbolic geography: the place where the domesticated and the wild meet on equal terms. The trapper who first notices Enkidu goes there. Shamhat is sent there. The transformation happens there. The watering hole is the boundary Enkidu crosses from the wild into the human world — and, crucially, he can never return to it, because the animals recognize the change and flee from him once it has happened.

The Bull of Heaven's Haunch — After Enkidu and Gilgamesh kill the Bull of Heaven sent by Inanna, Enkidu tears off a haunch and throws it at the goddess's face. This gesture — reckless, contemptuous, perfectly in character for someone who has never fully understood the rules he has entered — seals his fate. The divine council has been waiting for a pretext. The haunch thrown at a goddess is Enkidu at his most himself: strong, loyal to his companion, completely unequipped to navigate the political consequences of his own actions. It is the symbol of all the ways civilization did not fully take hold in him.

The Cedar Forest — The journey to the Cedar Forest to kill Humbaba is Enkidu's expedition as much as Gilgamesh's, and the tablets make clear that Enkidu is afraid but goes anyway. The Cedar Forest belongs to Enlil. It is a place where humans are not supposed to go. Enkidu, who came from the wilderness, has knowledge of wild places that Gilgamesh lacks — yet it is Enkidu who knows the forest is forbidden and goes anyway. His courage in the Cedar Forest is also his sentence. The cedar logs they float back to Uruk are civilization's gain, purchased at the cost of divine order and, eventually, Enkidu's life.

No contemporary image of Enkidu from the ancient world can be identified with certainty. The problem is that the ancient Mesopotamians did not typically illustrate the Epic of Gilgamesh the way Greek vase painters illustrated the Iliad or the labors of Heracles. Cuneiform tablets carry text, not images, and the monumental sculpture and cylinder seal art of ancient Mesopotamia that does depict hero-and-wild-man combat scenes cannot be definitively linked to the Gilgamesh epic by inscribed caption.

The candidates are nonetheless compelling. Ancient Mesopotamian cylinder seals from the third millennium BCE — before the written versions of the Epic were consolidated — frequently depict a long-haired, muscular male figure wrestling lions or bulls, a type scholars call the "bull-man" or "naked hero." This figure, shown with the physical features of a wild man (heavy musculature, curly hair, sometimes animal legs), appears alongside another figure who may represent Gilgamesh. Whether these images are specifically Enkidu or represent a broader tradition of the hero-pair is contested. The lack of accompanying inscription on cylinder seals means the identification is inferential.

The most discussed candidate image is a carved stone panel from the Palace of Sargon II at Khorsabad (c. 721–705 BCE), now held partly in the Louvre and partly in the Oriental Institute in Chicago. It depicts a bearded hero holding a lion against his hip — a posture of power and ease associated by some scholars with both Gilgamesh and Enkidu. The figure's wild appearance (heavy curly beard, elaborate musculature) fits the Enkidu description better than the Gilgamesh one, but the identification is not secure.

In modern visual culture, Enkidu appears in book illustration, academic reconstruction art, and graphic novels and games drawing on the Epic. The visual convention that has emerged — a large, heavily muscled man with long matted hair, wearing animal skins, shown either at the watering hole or locked in an embrace with a slightly more civilized-looking Gilgamesh — draws on the textual description in Tablet I more than on any verified ancient image. Enkidu's visual representation in antiquity remains unverified; modern depictions are interpretive reconstructions of what the tablets describe.

Worship Practices

Enkidu received no direct cult worship in the ancient Mesopotamian world. He was not a figure to whom temples were built or sacrifices offered. His presence in the culture was textual and pedagogical rather than cultic — the Epic of Gilgamesh was one of the core texts of the Mesopotamian scribal curriculum, and Enkidu's story was known to every student who trained in cuneiform writing in the edubba, the Sumerian and Babylonian scribal schools.

The edubba tradition meant the Epic circulated across centuries and across language boundaries. Old Babylonian tablets (c. 1800 BCE) carry earlier versions of the Enkidu episodes. Hittite and Hurrian translations of portions of the Epic survive from Anatolia (modern Turkey), indicating the story was known and studied outside Mesopotamia. A fragment discovered at Megiddo in modern Israel, dated to the 14th century BCE, places Gilgamesh material in Canaan during the Late Bronze Age. Enkidu's transformation and his friendship with Gilgamesh were, in this sense, the common cultural property of the ancient Near East.

In the context of Mesopotamian religion, Enkidu participates in a tradition of associating wild or marginal beings with divine creative force. The apkallu — the seven antediluvian sages depicted as part-fish, part-human, associated with wisdom given to humanity before the flood — occupy a similar conceptual space: beings who carry pre-civilized knowledge into the human world, then recede. Enkidu is not an apkallu, but his position as a clay-made creature of the steppe who carries knowledge of the natural world into the city draws on the same symbolic vocabulary.

For the contemporary practitioner or student of mythology, Enkidu's relevance is less cultic and more psychological. The arc of his story — wildness, initiation, friendship, death, grief as transformation — maps onto what many traditions describe as the cost of consciousness: the awareness that we have given something up to live in the human world as we find it, and that what we gave up was not nothing.

Sacred Texts

The primary source for Enkidu is the cuneiform text known as the Standard Babylonian Epic of Gilgamesh, compiled by the scholar-scribe Sin-leqi-unninni (whose name means "Inquire of the moon god, accept my lament") in approximately the 13th or 12th century BCE. The Standard Babylonian version organizes the material across twelve tablets. Tablet I describes Enkidu's creation and transformation by Shamhat. Tablets II and III cover his journey to Uruk and the meeting with Gilgamesh. Tablets IV and V cover the journey to the Cedar Forest and the death of Humbaba. Tablet VI covers the Bull of Heaven episode and the divine council's sentence. Tablets VII and VIII contain Enkidu's illness, his two sets of dreams, his death, and Gilgamesh's lament over him. The Twelfth Tablet — generally considered a later addition — contains a Sumerian composition in which Enkidu descends to the underworld and cannot return, delivering a final report on what death looks like from below.

Earlier Sumerian compositions provide precursors to the Akkadian figure. The Sumerian poem Gilgamesh and the Bull of Heaven includes a companion figure. Gilgamesh, Enkidu, and the Netherworld is the Sumerian source text behind Tablet XII of the Akkadian Epic. These Sumerian compositions are older than the Akkadian synthesis — the earliest may date to the Third Dynasty of Ur (c. 2100–2000 BCE) — and they show Enkidu in a somewhat different role: less developed as a character, more functional as Gilgamesh's companion and instrument. The Akkadian compiler Sin-leqi-unninni, or the tradition he was working in, substantially expanded and deepened the Enkidu figure into the complex character the Standard Babylonian version presents.

The Old Babylonian version (c. 1800 BCE) is known from several tablets, including the Philadelphia tablet and the Yale tablet, which preserve an earlier form of the Enkidu–Shamhat encounter and the Enkidu–Gilgamesh meeting. These tablets show a different emphasis: the Old Babylonian version pays more attention to the wrestling match and its context than the Standard Babylonian version does. The differences between versions are part of what makes the study of Enkidu's literary history intellectually rich — the character evolved over roughly a millennium of composition.

The authoritative modern scholarly edition is A.R. George's The Babylonian Gilgamesh Epic: Introduction, Critical Edition and Cuneiform Texts (Oxford, 2003), which prints the cuneiform text with transliteration, translation, and extensive philological commentary. Andrew George's Penguin Classics translation (2003) is the standard accessible edition. Stephanie Dalley's translation in Myths from Mesopotamia (Oxford, 1989) provides a reliable second rendering and useful parallel texts including the Atrahasis Epic, which provides the broader context for Mesopotamian human-creation theology into which Enkidu's clay origin fits.

Significance

The archetype of the noble wild. Enkidu is the first literary embodiment of a figure that recurs across world mythology: the person who exists outside civilization's systems of meaning, who is stronger and freer for it, and who is diminished — even destroyed — by entry into the social world. He does not choose to become human in the full cultural sense; it happens to him. The tablets are unsentimental about this. He loses the ability to run with the animals. He becomes mortal in a way the steppe animals are not, precisely because he becomes capable of contempt for the gods and pride in his own deeds. Civilized consciousness carries its own sentence.

The death that structures the epic. Scholars since the twentieth century have recognized that the Epic of Gilgamesh is not primarily about Gilgamesh and Enkidu's adventures — it is about what happens after Enkidu dies. The Cedar Forest expedition and the Bull of Heaven episode exist to set up the divine council's decision: one of the two must die. Enkidu's illness and death occupy Tablets VII and VIII. The second half of the Epic — Gilgamesh wandering in the wilderness, crossing the Waters of Death, finding Utnapishtim, and failing to hold onto the plant of immortality — is entirely Enkidu's aftermath. The Twelfth Tablet, often considered a later addition, is structured as a lament: Enkidu descends to the underworld to retrieve Gilgamesh's dropped drum and cannot return. His spirit rises through a hole in the earth and tells Gilgamesh what death is like below. It is not peaceful. It is not heroic. The warrior whose body was unwashed and unburied lies in a corner and weeps. This is the last Enkidu appearance in the Standard Babylonian text.

Grief as civilization's engine. The conventional reading of the Epic treats it as a story about the failure to achieve immortality. The deeper reading is that grief itself is the achievement. Gilgamesh could not have built the walls of Uruk — could not have seen them clearly as his legacy — without having lost Enkidu and understood, through that loss, what it means to be mortal. The wild man dies so that the king can grow up. Enkidu is not a subordinate character but the structural precondition for the entire civilizing arc of the story.

The friendship as literary first. The bond between Gilgamesh and Enkidu is the earliest extended depiction of male friendship in world literature. It is not a bond between equals in the administrative sense — Gilgamesh is king, Enkidu a wild man civilized by a priestess — but it is a bond between equals in the physical and emotional sense, and the text insists on this. Gilgamesh does not grieve a servant or a subordinate. He grieves someone he loved like a wife, a brother, his own body. The depth of his mourning — his refusal to bury the body, his walk into the wilderness — only makes sense if the loss is total. The Epic invented grief as a literary subject.

Cross-tradition resonance. The motif of the wild man who is civilized through encounter with a woman, then drawn into a dangerous friendship with a hero, then sacrificed so the hero can complete his arc, has parallels in the Dionysus-Ariadne tradition, in Norse berserker figures, and in the Wild Man traditions of medieval European folklore. The Enkidu type persists because it encodes a genuine psychological truth: something in us knows what it cost us to become social, rational, rule-following beings. That pre-social nature is the wildness the steppe animals recognized in Enkidu before he did. It is always there. Leaving it always costs something.

Connections

Enki — Enkidu's creation by Aruru places him within the same clay-working tradition as Enki's own fashioning of human beings. Both Enkidu and Enki's humans are made from earth and animated by divine intention. Enki is the god of wisdom who repeatedly protects humanity from the harsher decrees of the divine council — the same council that sentences Enkidu to death. His role as humanity's advocate makes him Enkidu's closest divine analogue in the pantheon, even though Enki does not appear prominently in the Epic itself.

Inanna / Ishtar — Enkidu's refusal of Inanna's advances (when she proposes to Gilgamesh) and his act of throwing the Bull of Heaven's haunch at her face is the direct cause of his death. The divine council convenes because of this insult. Inanna is not a rejected lover in this episode; she is the most powerful goddess in the Mesopotamian pantheon, and Enkidu's contempt for her is a contempt for the entire divine order he has been brought into contact with. His death is the price of that contempt.

Enlil — Enlil placed Humbaba as guardian of the Cedar Forest. Enkidu and Gilgamesh's killing of Humbaba is an offense against Enlil's authority, and Enlil is among the gods who vote that one of the two heroes must die. The relationship is entirely antagonistic: the wild man who entered civilization through Shamhat's teaching ends up destroyed by a god who had ordered the boundaries of the natural world protected.

Shamash — The sun god Shamash is the one member of the divine council who argues for mercy and is overruled. He also assists the heroes during the Cedar Forest expedition by pinning Humbaba in place with storm winds. In Enkidu's dream in Tablet VII, as he foresees his death and begins to curse Shamhat for having tamed him, Shamash intercedes from heaven and persuades him to bless her instead. Shamash is the closest thing the heroes have to a divine ally.

Ninhursag / Ninmah — The mother goddess Ninhursag is closely linked to Aruru, the goddess who pinches Enkidu from clay in Tablet I. In some traditions these are the same figure under different names; in others, Aruru is an aspect of Ninhursag's creative function. Enkidu's origin in divine clay-working connects him to the broader Mesopotamian mythology of human creation in which Ninhursag or her equivalents shape life from earth and the blood of a slain god.

Nergal — Ruler of the underworld whom Enkidu's situation implicates in the Twelfth Tablet. Enkidu descends to retrieve Gilgamesh's drum, becomes trapped, and cannot return. The god Ea intercedes with Nergal (or his consort Ereshkigal, depending on the version), who opens a hole in the earth so Enkidu's spirit can rise. Enkidu's report to Gilgamesh on the conditions of the dead is the earliest surviving account of what the Mesopotamian underworld looked like from the inside.

Ereshkigal — Queen of the underworld whose realm Enkidu cannot escape once he enters it in the Twelfth Tablet. The contrast between Inanna's descent to the underworld (which Inanna survives by negotiation and substitution) and Enkidu's permanent entrapment there is pointed: the goddess can navigate the boundary between living and dead, the hero cannot. Ereshkigal's realm is the final horizon that the Epic uses to show what no human power can overcome.

Loki — A cross-tradition structural parallel. Like Enkidu, Loki exists at the boundary between the natural and the divine, is brought into the ordered world through alliance with a more powerful companion, and destroyed by that world's rules. Both are bound — Enkidu by illness and divine decree, Loki to a rock with venom dripping on his face. Both are most fully themselves in moments of loyalty that collide with cosmic law. The parallel is structural, not genealogical.

Further Reading

  • The Epic of Gilgamesh, trans. Andrew George — Penguin Classics, 2003. The standard modern English translation of the Standard Babylonian version across all twelve tablets, with Old Babylonian fragments included. George's introduction on the composition history and Sin-leqi-unninni's role as compiler is essential context.
  • Myths from Mesopotamia, trans. Stephanie Dalley — Oxford World's Classics, 1989. Includes a reliable second translation of the Epic with comparative notes; useful alongside George for variant readings and for parallel texts including the Atrahasis Epic.
  • A.R. George, The Babylonian Gilgamesh Epic: Introduction, Critical Edition and Cuneiform Texts, 2 vols., Oxford University Press, 2003. The scholarly critical edition on which modern translations are based; Enkidu's creation and transformation in Tablet I analyzed in detail.
  • Jeffrey Tigay, The Evolution of the Gilgamesh Epic, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1982. Traces the development of the Enkidu figure from Sumerian precursor texts through the Standard Babylonian version; essential for understanding how Enkidu's role expanded across centuries of composition.
  • Martin West, The East Face of Helicon: West Asiatic Elements in Greek Poetry and Myth, Oxford University Press, 1997. Places the Gilgamesh–Enkidu relationship within the broader tradition of Near Eastern hero-companion pairs and traces transmission into Greek epic, including parallels with Achilles and Patroclus.
  • Tzvi Abusch, Male and Female in the Epic of Gilgamesh: Encounters, Literary History, and Interpretation, Eisenbrauns, 2015. Focused analysis of Enkidu's relationship with Shamhat, Inanna, and the gendered dynamics of civilization in the Epic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who created Enkidu and why?

Enkidu was created by the mother goddess Aruru, who pinched him from clay and threw him into the steppe. She made him on the instruction of Anu, the sky god, in response to the people of Uruk's complaint about their restless king Gilgamesh. The idea was to create a counterweight — someone of equal physical strength who could absorb Gilgamesh's energy and give the city relief. Aruru had previously created humanity from clay mixed with divine material in the Mesopotamian creation tradition; Enkidu is made by the same hands with the same material, but deposited in the wilderness rather than the city. He grows up running with the animals of the steppe, fills in hunters' traps, and has no knowledge of bread, beer, or cultivated life until Shamhat, a priestess of Inanna's temple, initiates his transformation through six days and seven nights together at the watering hole.

What does Enkidu's transformation from wild man to companion mean?

The tablets describe Enkidu's initiation by Shamhat not simply as a seduction but as the full process of becoming human in the Mesopotamian cultural sense: he learns to eat bread and drink beer (the two staples of Mesopotamian civilized life), to wear clothing, to anoint himself with oil — the markers of social status and belonging. After this transformation, the animals at the watering hole recognize him as changed and flee. He has crossed a threshold that cannot be uncrossed. The text is unsentimental about what this costs him: he is slower, he can no longer run with the gazelles, he is now capable of loneliness in a way the animals are not. What he gains is companionship — the ability to be a friend to Gilgamesh, to walk into the Cedar Forest with another person and share the terror of it. What he loses is the steppe. The Epic does not pretend otherwise.

Why does Enkidu die?

Enkidu dies as a result of the divine council's decision following two offenses against the gods: he and Gilgamesh killed Humbaba, the guardian of the Cedar Forest placed there by Enlil, and then Enkidu threw the haunch of the slain Bull of Heaven at the goddess Inanna's face after she sent the bull to punish their refusal of her advances. Anu, Enlil, and Shamash convene and decide that one of the two heroes must die as atonement. Shamash argues for mercy and is overruled. Enkidu is chosen. He falls sick, lies on his bed for twelve days, and dies. The cause of death is divine sentence, not wound or battle — he is killed by a decision made in the cosmic assembly, which gives his death its particular weight. No amount of physical strength can oppose it.

What is the relationship between Enkidu and Gilgamesh?

The Epic of Gilgamesh describes the bond between Enkidu and Gilgamesh with language that goes beyond ordinary friendship. The Akkadian text says Gilgamesh loved Enkidu like a wife — like his own body. After Enkidu dies, Gilgamesh refuses to believe it and waits seven days for him to wake. When he finally accepts the death, he covers himself in a lion skin, lets his hair grow matted, and walks out of Uruk into the wilderness — which is, structurally, to go back to the world Enkidu came from. The friendship is the earliest extended literary treatment of male friendship in world literature. It is not a bond between a king and a servant; it is the meeting of two equally powerful beings who become necessary to each other. Enkidu's death is the structural engine of the entire second half of the Epic: without the grief, there is no quest for Utnapishtim, no looking at the walls of Uruk at the end and understanding that they are enough.

What happens to Enkidu in the Twelfth Tablet of the Epic?

The Twelfth Tablet, generally considered a later addition to the Standard Babylonian version rather than an original part of Sin-leqi-unninni's compilation, is a translation of an older Sumerian composition called 'Gilgamesh, Enkidu, and the Netherworld.' In it, Gilgamesh drops his drum and drumstick into the underworld. Enkidu volunteers to retrieve them. Gilgamesh gives precise instructions on how to behave there — do not dress in clean clothes, do not anoint yourself with oil, do not embrace your dead wife or children or the dead will hold on to you. Enkidu disregards every instruction. He is trapped in the underworld and cannot return. The god Ea intercedes, and Enkidu's spirit rises through a hole in the earth like smoke. He describes what death looks like: the warrior whose body was unwashed lies weeping in a corner; the man with many sons sits rejoicing; the man with no burial rites wanders without rest. It is the oldest surviving description of the underworld from the inside, and it is not peaceful or heroic.