What is Western Astrology?
Western astrology uses a tropical zodiac fixed to the March equinox, twelve signs and houses, seven traditional plus three modern planets, and Ptolemy's five aspects — a Hellenistic synthesis codified in the Tetrabiblos around 150 CE.
About What is Western Astrology?
Western astrology is the system that places the vernal equinox — the moment each March when the Sun crosses the celestial equator going north — at 0° Aries, then divides the ecliptic into twelve equal 30° signs from that anchor. Every chart wheel, every horoscope column, every "Sun sign" tradition that traces back to Hellenistic-era Alexandria rests on that single convention. The system has roots in Babylonian sky-watching tablets older than 1500 BCE, was synthesized into a horoscopic art in Ptolemaic Egypt around the 2nd century BCE, codified by Claudius Ptolemy near 150 CE, preserved through Arabic and Persian scholarship, revived in Renaissance Europe, and reshaped twice in the modern era — first by the Theosophists in late-Victorian London, then by a small group of translators who spent the 1990s recovering its Greek-language sources.
This page is the doorway. It defines the system, names the assumptions Vedic astrology (Jyotish) rejects, lists the working parts, and shows how each piece functions inside a chart reading. The aim is not to argue for or against the system but to name its pieces clearly enough that a beginner can walk into a natal reading and know which structure is being referenced when an astrologer says "Mercury in Gemini in the 3rd house, square Saturn."
The defining choice: a tropical zodiac tied to the seasons
The single decision that distinguishes Western astrology from its Vedic cousin is the choice of zodiac. Western astrology uses the tropical zodiac, in which 0° Aries is permanently fixed to the March equinox — the point where the ecliptic and the celestial equator cross with the Sun moving north. Because Earth's rotational axis wobbles slowly (the precession of the equinoxes), this equinox point drifts backward through the visible constellations at roughly 50.3 arcseconds per year, completing a full circuit in about 25,772 years according to the IAU 2006 precession model. The tropical zodiac does not follow this drift. It stays locked to the seasons.
The practical consequence is that someone born on April 1st has the Sun in tropical Aries — the first sign of spring in the Northern Hemisphere — even though, telescopically, the Sun is currently against the stars of the constellation Pisces. Vedic astrology takes the opposite choice: it tracks a sidereal zodiac aligned to the actual fixed-star background, applying an offset (an ayanamsa) of about 24° in the present era. The full mechanics of that disagreement live on the dedicated page Tropical vs Sidereal Zodiac; the structural article on the ecliptic itself is at Precession of the Equinoxes.
The tropical choice is older than it sometimes gets credit for. Hipparchus of Nicaea, working around 127 BCE, is the figure usually credited with discovering precession; the Hellenistic astrologers who came after him knew the equinox slipped against the stars and chose to keep their zodiac tied to the seasonal anchor anyway. Ptolemy, in the Tetrabiblos (c. 150 CE), defines the signs starting from the tropical points and never wavers from that. Modern Western astrology kept the choice with little organized challenge until the 20th century, when sidereal Western movements (the work of Cyril Fagan and Donald Bradley in the 1940s-50s) attempted to realign Western practice with the visible stars. They remain a small minority within the Western tradition.
From Babylon to Alexandria: where the system came from
Western astrology is the surviving offspring of a long fusion. The seed was Mesopotamian. Babylonian scribes maintained celestial omen lists — the most famous being the Enūma Anu Enlil, a series of roughly 68-70 cuneiform tablets compiled across the second millennium BCE and containing thousands of omens reading celestial events as state-level signals: lunar eclipses, planetary conjunctions, halos around the Moon. These were predictive, but they were not yet personal. The omen tradition was about the king and the kingdom.
The transition from omens to natal charts — horoscopes cast for the moment a particular human being was born — happened during the Hellenistic period, in the cultural mixing bowl of Greco-Roman Alexandria, roughly between the late 2nd century BCE and the 2nd century CE. The synthesis combined four threads: Babylonian planetary observation and zodiac use, Egyptian decanal divisions of the sky into ten-degree segments, Greek mathematical astronomy descending from Eudoxus and Hipparchus, and Greek philosophical frameworks (Stoic, Hermetic, Platonic) that supplied the metaphysical scaffolding for thinking about fate and the soul. The Hellenistic Greek term horoscopos — "hour-marker" — gave us both "horoscope" and the word for the rising sign or Ascendant.
By the time Ptolemy compiled the Tetrabiblos around 150 CE, the working architecture was set: twelve signs, twelve houses, seven traditional planets, five major aspects, sect distinctions between day and night charts, and a system of planetary rulerships and dignities. Most of what a Western astrologer uses today descends directly from that Hellenistic synthesis. A short historical timeline lives on the companion page Anatomy of a Birth Chart; we treat the deep history (Project Hindsight, the Schmidt-Hand-Zoller recovery, the medieval Arabic transmission) on the dedicated history hub.
The twelve signs
The twelve signs are the most public face of Western astrology — and the most easily misread, because a sign is a 30° slice of the ecliptic, not a constellation. The sign Aries begins at the vernal equinox; Taurus begins 30° later; Gemini begins 60° in; and so on through Cancer, Leo, Virgo, Libra, Scorpio, Sagittarius, Capricorn, Aquarius, and Pisces.
The signs are organized by three nested classifications that a chart reader uses constantly:
- Element — fire (Aries, Leo, Sagittarius), earth (Taurus, Virgo, Capricorn), air (Gemini, Libra, Aquarius), water (Cancer, Scorpio, Pisces). Three signs per element, ninety degrees apart.
- Modality — cardinal (Aries, Cancer, Libra, Capricorn — the season-starters), fixed (Taurus, Leo, Scorpio, Aquarius — the season-stabilizers), mutable (Gemini, Virgo, Sagittarius, Pisces — the season-transitions).
- Polarity — masculine/yang/active (the fire and air signs) and feminine/yin/receptive (the earth and water signs).
This grid is not decoration; it does interpretive work. Two planets in the same element are said to be in trine (120°) and to share an underlying motivational current. Two planets in the same modality but different elements are typically in square (90°) and read as a productive friction. The sign system gives the chart its inner geometry.
The twelve houses
If the signs are the where on the wheel of the year, the houses are the where in the life of the person. The houses divide the chart into twelve life-domain segments — 1st for self and embodiment, 2nd for resources and value, 3rd for siblings and immediate environment, 4th for home and lineage, 5th for creativity and children, 6th for work and health, 7th for partnership, 8th for shared resources and transformation, 9th for higher learning and travel, 10th for vocation and public role, 11th for community and groups, and 12th for the hidden, retreat, and the unconscious.
Multiple house systems compete inside Western astrology. The Hellenistic standard was whole-sign houses, in which the sign rising at the moment of birth becomes the entire 1st house and each subsequent sign occupies a whole house in zodiacal order. Through medieval and modern periods this gave way to quadrant systems like Placidus (still the default in most commercial software), Koch, Regiomontanus, and Porphyry, which divide the wheel by time-based or space-based formulas anchored on the Ascendant and Midheaven. The Project Hindsight recovery work in the 1990s revived whole-sign as a serious option, and Demetra George's Ancient Astrology in Theory and Practice (Rubedo Press, 2019) makes the case for it directly. Competent astrologers use whichever system reproduces results they trust.
The planets: seven traditional, three modern
The seven traditional planets — visible to the naked eye and known to every pre-telescopic culture — are the working pieces of Hellenistic and medieval Western astrology: Sun, Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn. Each rules one or two of the twelve signs in the traditional rulership scheme: Sun rules Leo, Moon rules Cancer, Mercury rules Gemini and Virgo, Venus rules Taurus and Libra, Mars rules Aries and Scorpio, Jupiter rules Sagittarius and Pisces, Saturn rules Capricorn and Aquarius. The pattern is symmetric around the Sun-Moon axis: an ancient structural feature, not a modern adjustment.
The three modern planets — telescopic discoveries — are added to that lineup in most contemporary Western practice but not in traditional or horary work. Uranus was discovered by William Herschel on March 13, 1781; Neptune was first observed by Johann Galle at the Berlin Observatory on September 23, 1846 from calculations by Urbain Le Verrier and John Couch Adams; Pluto was located by Clyde Tombaugh at Lowell Observatory on February 18, 1930 and announced March 13, 1930. Modern psychological astrology (Rudhyar, Greene, Arroyo) reassigned three signs to these new bodies — Uranus became the modern co-ruler of Aquarius, Neptune of Pisces, Pluto of Scorpio — though traditionalists keep Saturn, Jupiter, and Mars in those rulerships.
Some Western astrologers add the lunar nodes (the North and South Nodes of the Moon's orbit, which Vedic astrology treats as the shadow planets Rahu and Ketu), the four major asteroids (Ceres, Pallas, Juno, Vesta), Chiron, and a handful of Trans-Neptunian points. These are working tools rather than required pieces. A natal reading can be complete with the seven traditional planets alone — and many practitioners trained in the Project Hindsight lineage prefer it that way.
Aspects: the geometry between the planets
An aspect is a specific angular distance between two planets, measured along the ecliptic. Ptolemy formalized five major aspects, and they remain the spine of Western chart reading:
- Conjunction — 0° apart. Two planets fused in the same place; their natures merge, intensify, and complicate each other.
- Sextile — 60° apart. An opportunity aspect; effort makes it productive.
- Square — 90° apart. Tension that demands resolution; the friction generates the work.
- Trine — 120° apart. Easy flow between the planets; the gift can become a bypass if relied on without other pressure.
- Opposition — 180° apart. Polarity, projection, balancing act between two ends of a single axis.
An orb is the allowed deviation from exactness — a Sun-Moon trine at 123° still counts as a trine in most modern systems with 5° orbs, but Hellenistic astrology used much tighter orbs and judged aspects largely as whole-sign relationships rather than degree-precise measurements. Modern psychological astrology uses orbs of 5-10° depending on the planets involved; horary astrology, which works with split-second precision, uses orbs of 1-2°.
Beyond Ptolemy's five, modern Western astrology also recognizes minor aspects — semisextile (30°), semisquare (45°), sesquiquadrate (135°), quincunx or inconjunct (150°), and the harmonic series developed by John Addey in the 1970s. These are working refinements rather than universal standards.
The chart wheel: how it all assembles
A natal chart wheel is a 360° map of the sky as seen from the place and moment of birth. The reader is at the center. The eastern horizon at that moment becomes the Ascendant (1st house cusp) — the rising sign. The southern meridian — the highest point the Sun reaches that day — becomes the Midheaven or MC (the 10th house cusp in most quadrant systems). The opposite points are the Descendant (7th house cusp) and the Imum Coeli or IC (4th house cusp). These four angles structure the wheel.
The signs are then drawn around the outer rim in zodiacal order. The houses are drawn inside the rim. The planets are placed in their actual ecliptic longitude positions at the moment of birth. The astrologer reads the chart by attending to: which sign each planet is in, which house each planet falls into, what aspects each planet makes to every other planet, where the lights (Sun and Moon) are, and what the Ascendant ruler is doing. The full mechanics of chart construction live on the companion article Anatomy of a Birth Chart; the dignity rules that determine planetary strength live on Planetary Dignities; the rules governing apparent backward motion are on Retrograde Motion.
What Western astrology does with the chart
Western astrology is not a single practice. It is a family of practices that share the chart-construction mechanics above and diverge in what they ask of the chart:
- Natal astrology — interpreting a person's birth chart for character, life patterns, and timing. The most common form.
- Horary astrology — answering a specific question by casting a chart for the moment the question is asked. The Lilly tradition (1647).
- Electional astrology — choosing an auspicious time to begin a venture by selecting the chart for the inception moment.
- Mundane astrology — interpreting world events through ingress charts (the moments the Sun enters the four cardinal signs each year, especially the Aries ingress), eclipses, and great-conjunction cycles.
- Medical astrology — historically, the body-zodiac mapping (Aries-head down to Pisces-feet) and decumbiture charts cast for the onset of illness. Now a specialty branch within traditional astrology rather than a clinical discipline; covered in detail at medical astrology.
- Synastry and composite — chart-comparison techniques for relationships: overlaying two natal charts (synastry) or generating a single chart from the midpoints between them (the standard Robert Hand composite; a Davison variant uses the midpoint moment in time and space instead).
Within natal astrology there are further schools: traditional/Hellenistic (Brennan, George, Hand, the Project Hindsight current), psychological (Rudhyar, Greene, Arroyo, Tarnas), evolutionary (Jeff Green, Steven Forrest), Uranian/Hamburg School, and several smaller branches. Each works the same chart with different interpretive priorities.
How Western astrology timed events: transits, progressions, and revivals
Predictive techniques in Western astrology come in three rough families. Transits read the actual day-by-day motion of planets in the sky against the natal chart — Robert Hand's Planets in Transit (Whitford Press, 1976) became the standard reference for this technique in modern practice. Secondary progressions advance the natal chart at a rate of one day per year of life, treating the second day after birth as the chart for the second year. Solar arc directions move all planets at the same rate as the progressed Sun. To these, the Project Hindsight recovery added profections (annual age-based sign rotation) and zodiacal releasing (a Hellenistic time-lord system from Vettius Valens), restoring techniques that had been dormant for over a thousand years.
The 1990s revival is one of the most important recent events inside Western astrology. Project Hindsight, conceived by Robert Schmidt and launched in 1993 with Robert Hand as general editor and Robert Zoller as Latin translator, undertook to translate the surviving Greek and Latin astrological corpus directly into English. Schmidt's reconstructions surfaced concepts — sect, whole-sign houses, zodiacal releasing, the Lots — that modern psychological astrology had effectively lost. Demetra George and Chris Brennan teach this lineage today; Brennan's Hellenistic Astrology: The Study of Fate and Fortune (Amor Fati Publications, 2017) is the single most thorough English-language synthesis of the recovery work. A reader newly entering Western astrology in 2026 inherits two parallel currents: the psychological 20th-century stream and the recovered Hellenistic stream, often used together.
What Western astrology assumes (and where Vedic astrology takes a different starting point)
Naming the assumptions makes the comparison cleaner. Western astrology, in its standard modern form, assumes: a tropical zodiac fixed to the seasons; interpretation primarily oriented to psychology and meaning rather than event-prediction; outer planets included as full bodies; a degree of free will and participation in the unfolding of a chart. Vedic astrology (Jyotish) assumes: a sidereal zodiac aligned to fixed stars; a strong predictive orientation including specific timing of life events; the seven traditional planets plus Rahu and Ketu (the lunar nodes), without Uranus, Neptune, or Pluto; the twelve bhavas with rulership rules that descend from Brihat Parashara Hora Shastra; the 27-nakshatra lunar mansion system; and a karmic framework in which the chart describes the unfolding of past-life karma in this lifetime.
Neither system collapses into the other. They share enough mechanical apparatus — twelve signs, seven traditional planets, twelve houses, aspect-based geometry — that translation is possible; they differ enough in starting points (the zodiac question), included bodies, and interpretive aim that the same chart yields different readings depending on which system is used. Sarah's working position, and Satyori's editorial position, is that both are serious traditions with their own internal coherence. The cross-system comparison hub develops the contrast in detail.
Where to go from here
If this hub has done its job, you have the structural vocabulary — zodiac type, signs, houses, planets, aspects, chart wheel, branches, predictive techniques — and you know which page in the Satyori library to open next. For the construction of a chart in concrete steps, see Anatomy of a Birth Chart. For the mechanics of the zodiac choice that defines this entire system, see Tropical vs Sidereal Zodiac. For why an astrologer says one planet is "stronger" than another, see Planetary Dignities. For the most-asked question in modern practice — what does it mean when a planet goes retrograde — see Retrograde Motion. For the slow precessional drift that produces the "Age of Aquarius" question, see The Astrological Ages. For the parallel system that takes the opposite zodiac choice, see Vedic vs. Western Astrology — The Complete Guide. The signs, planets, and houses each have their own dedicated entity pages; follow any link above to enter that body of the library.
Significance
Western astrology is the longest continuously practiced symbolic system in the European intellectual tradition — older than the calendar most readers use, older than the printing press, older than every modern school of psychology — and because the questions it tries to answer are the same questions every wisdom tradition asks: what is this life for, why am I shaped the way I am, when does the work get easier. The Hellenistic synthesis carried by Ptolemy in the Tetrabiblos (c. 150 CE) was preserved through the Arabic and Persian medieval period, transmitted to William Lilly's seventeenth-century England in Christian Astrology (1647), reshaped psychologically by Alan Leo and Dane Rudhyar in the early twentieth century, and recovered in its Hellenistic form by Robert Schmidt's Project Hindsight in the 1990s. Studying it gives a reader access to that conversation across two thousand years and lets them locate themselves in it.
Connections
Tropical vs Sidereal Zodiac — the structural choice that distinguishes Western astrology from Vedic astrology and from sidereal Western branches.
Anatomy of a Birth Chart — the working mechanics of how the wheel is built once the zodiac is set.
Planetary Dignities — the system that determines whether a planet operates with strength or weakness in a given sign and house.
Retrograde Motion — the apparent backward motion that triggers more questions in modern practice than almost any other concept.
The Astrological Ages — the precessional cycle that produces the question of which "age" we are in and what that means.
Vedic vs. Western Astrology — The Complete Guide — the cross-system comparison hub that develops the contrast in detail.
Precession of the Equinoxes — the astronomical phenomenon Hipparchus discovered around 127 BCE that the tropical zodiac chooses to ignore.
The Saturn Return — the most-discussed transit in modern Western practice and a useful entry into how aspects-by-time work.
The Twelve Bhavas (Houses) in Jyotish — the parallel house system used in Vedic astrology, which shares structural origin but diverges in rulership rules.
How to Find Your Rising Sign — the practical step a reader takes once they know the chart wheel exists.
Further Reading
- Brennan, Chris. Hellenistic Astrology: The Study of Fate and Fortune (Amor Fati Publications, 2017) — the single most thorough English-language synthesis of the Hellenistic recovery work. Required reading for anyone wanting to understand what Project Hindsight uncovered.
- George, Demetra. Ancient Astrology in Theory and Practice: A Manual of Traditional Techniques, Volume I — Assessing Planetary Condition (Rubedo Press, 2019) — a 622-page training manual built from decades of teaching the Hellenistic material.
- Lilly, William. Christian Astrology (1647; Astrology Classics reprint) — the first comprehensive astrology text printed in English. Foundational for horary practice and a window into pre-modern Western technique.
- Ptolemy, Claudius. Tetrabiblos (c. 150 CE; Loeb Classical Library edition, F. E. Robbins translation, Harvard University Press, 1940) — the systematic treatise that froze Hellenistic astrology in transmittable form for the next two millennia.
- Greene, Liz. Saturn: A New Look at an Old Devil (Weiser Books, 1976) — the founding text of late-twentieth-century psychological astrology. Greene reframed Saturn from medieval malefic to developmental teacher.
- Hand, Robert. Planets in Transit: Life Cycles for Living (Whitford Press, 1976) — the standard modern reference for transit interpretation. 720 worked delineations, still in continuous print.
- Rudhyar, Dane. The Astrology of Personality: A Reformulation of Astrological Concepts and Ideals in Terms of Contemporary Psychology and Philosophy (Lucis Publishing Company, 1936) — the founding text of humanistic astrology and the bridge from Theosophical to depth-psychological practice.
- Holden, James Herschel. A History of Horoscopic Astrology (American Federation of Astrologers, 2nd ed. 2006) — the most thorough single-volume technical history of Western astrology from Babylonian roots through the twentieth century.
- Campion, Nicholas. A History of Western Astrology, Volume I: The Ancient World and Volume II: The Medieval and Modern Worlds (Continuum, 2008-2009) — academic two-volume treatment by the historian of astrology at the University of Wales Trinity Saint David.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between Western astrology and Vedic astrology?
The structural difference is the zodiac. Western astrology uses the tropical zodiac, anchored to the March equinox at 0° Aries — a seasonal reference point that does not shift with precession. Vedic astrology (Jyotish) uses the sidereal zodiac, aligned to the actual fixed-star background, with an offset (ayanamsa) of about 24° in the present era. Beyond the zodiac, the systems diverge in included bodies (Vedic uses the lunar nodes Rahu and Ketu, omits Uranus/Neptune/Pluto), in interpretive aim (Vedic is more predictive and karmic; modern Western is more psychological), in house calculation (Vedic mostly uses whole-sign houses; modern Western typically uses Placidus quadrant houses), and in the use of nakshatras (the 27 lunar mansions that have no Western equivalent). Both systems share the twelve signs, the seven traditional planets, and the geometric concept of aspects between planets. A full development of the comparison lives at /jyotish/articles/vedic-vs-western-astrology-complete-guide/.
When did Western astrology actually begin?
The honest answer is that it crystallized in stages. Mesopotamian celestial omen-reading is documented in the Enūma Anu Enlil, a series of 68-70 cuneiform tablets compiled across the second millennium BCE. The transition from omen-reading (state-level prediction) to horoscopic astrology (individual natal charts) happened during the late Hellenistic period in Greco-Roman Egypt, roughly between 100 BCE and 200 CE, with most of the synthesis happening in or near Alexandria. Claudius Ptolemy's Tetrabiblos, written around 150 CE in Koine Greek, codified the system into the form Western astrology has carried forward. So: Babylonian roots before 1500 BCE, individual horoscopy from roughly 200 BCE forward, systematic codification by 150 CE. Most of what a Western astrologer uses today descends directly from the Hellenistic synthesis Ptolemy preserved.
Why does Western astrology say I am a different sign than Vedic astrology says?
Because the two systems use different zodiacs. Western tropical astrology defines the signs by season — 0° Aries is the March equinox, 0° Cancer is the June solstice, 0° Libra is the September equinox, 0° Capricorn is the December solstice — regardless of where the Sun appears against the visible stars. Vedic sidereal astrology defines the signs by the fixed-star background, applying an ayanamsa offset (the most common is the Lahiri ayanamsa, currently around 24°) to account for the precession of the equinoxes since the two systems were last aligned (around 285 CE for the Lahiri reckoning). The result is that someone whose Western Sun sign is Aries — born in late March or early April when the Sun is in the first ~24° of tropical Aries — often becomes Vedic Pisces, because the Sun is then still against the visible stars of Pisces. Births in the last week of Aries remain Vedic Aries. Each sign-boundary works the same way. Neither system is wrong; they are answering different questions.
Do real astronomers take Western astrology seriously?
Most working astronomers consider astrology a symbolic / interpretive system rather than a predictive science. The academic separation between astronomy and astrology took its modern shape during the Enlightenment, with most universities dropping astrology from formal curricula by the eighteenth century. That said, the question is more interesting than the standard answer suggests. The astronomical machinery underneath Western astrology — orbital mechanics, the ecliptic, precession, planetary periods — is fully real and fully measurable. The question of whether the symbolic associations attached to those celestial mechanics correspond to anything real in human life is where astronomers and astrologers part ways. Statistical studies of astrological claims have produced largely null results in controlled-trial designs (the Carlson 1985 Nature study being the most cited). Astrologers respond that the system is not the kind of thing that yields to controlled-trial methodology — it is a hermeneutic system, more akin to literary criticism or a depth-psychological framework than to a falsifiable physical theory. Both positions are coherent on their own terms. Satyori treats astrology as a serious symbolic tradition without claiming it is a physical science.
What are the seven traditional planets and why those seven?
The seven traditional planets are the Sun, Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn — every celestial body visible to the naked eye that moves against the background of the fixed stars. Every pre-telescopic culture observed these seven bodies and noticed that they wandered (the Greek planētēs means wanderer). The number seven became foundational not just to astrology but to the calendar — our seven-day week is built from the seven traditional planets, in the order Saturn (Saturday), Sun (Sunday), Moon (Monday), Mars (Tuesday in Romance languages: martes, mardi), Mercury (Wednesday: miércoles, mercredi), Jupiter (Thursday: jueves, jeudi), Venus (Friday: viernes, vendredi). When Uranus was discovered in 1781, Neptune in 1846, and Pluto in 1930, modern astrology added them as full interpretive bodies. Traditional and horary astrologers continue to work primarily with the original seven.
What is a 'birth chart' and how is it different from a horoscope?
In careful Western usage, a birth chart (or natal chart) is the specific map of the heavens calculated for the exact moment, date, and location of an individual's birth — a one-time, life-long document. A horoscope (from Greek horoskopos, 'hour-marker') originally referred to the rising sign at any moment, and by extension to any chart cast for a moment. In modern colloquial usage 'horoscope' usually refers either to the entire birth chart or to a generalized Sun-sign forecast (the kind in newspapers and apps), which is a vast simplification — a Sun-sign forecast addresses one variable in a chart that contains dozens. A full birth chart includes the positions of the Sun, Moon, all visible and modern planets, the lunar nodes, the major angles (Ascendant, Midheaven, Descendant, IC), the house cusps, and the aspects between every body and every other body. The construction details live at /astrology/articles/anatomy-of-a-birth-chart/.
How accurate does my birth time need to be?
For Sun sign and Moon sign, birth time is mostly irrelevant — the Sun moves about 1° per day and the Moon about 13° per day, so a birth date alone fixes both within usable accuracy. For the Ascendant (rising sign), the Midheaven, and the house placements of the planets, birth time matters significantly: the Ascendant moves through one full sign roughly every two hours, so a birth time off by an hour can shift the rising sign and rotate every house cusp. For the more precise predictive techniques — secondary progressions, profections, zodiacal releasing — birth time accuracy of within four to five minutes is standard, and astrologers routinely rectify uncertain birth times — that is, work backwards from known life events to find the chart that fits. If your birth certificate gives a time, use it. If not, an astrologer can rectify, or you can work the chart with the Sun, Moon, and planets without house placements.